Let me introduce myself. I am the president and founder of the Anti Mr. Dan Becker Association. In the text that follows, I will explain why stopping Mr. Dan Becker is fundamental to the survival of our society. Let's start with my claim that if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that Dan holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink.
After watching Dan's companions effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet, one might conclude that Dan et al. would lay out their own ideas of philosophical pedagogy, textual interpretation, and moral philosophy. Surprisingly, nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, if I want to lose my temper, that should be my prerogative. I definitely don't need Dan forcing me to.
Dan wants to compose paeans to Lysenkoism. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that I would like to give you an example of how fatuous he can be. Dan has admitted that he intends to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example, but Dan has spent untold hours trying to deny minorities a cultural voice. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that his cajoleries will lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? The bigger question is the following: Why does he think that we ought to worship what I call phlegmatic, myopic stool pigeons as folk heroes. I confess that I don't know the answer to that question. I do know, however, that an understanding of the damage that may be caused by Dan's atrabilious obiter dicta isn't something I expect everyone to develop the first time they hear about it. That's why I write over and over again and from so many different angles about how I, hardheaded cynic that I am, recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to help people break free of Dan's cycle of oppression. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why the poisonous wine of cronyism had been distilled long before Dan entered the scene. Dan is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. This letter has gone on far too long in my opinion and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that my aim is to deal stiffly with disgusting, incomprehensible grifters who resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution.