Although I generally believe that the less said about Dr. Joshua Barnes, the better, I do feel obligated to say a few things about Joshua's misguided allocutions. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I preach a message of community and brotherly love. Ask him about any of his votaries who acquire power and use it to indoctrinate whiney, mudslinging fast-buck artists, and the deranged, asinine bugger will say, "I never meant they should go that far." Yeah, right. The truth is that Joshua's brethren coerce children into becoming activists willing to serve, promote, spy, and fight for Joshua's communiqués. So let Joshua call me insufferable. I call him quarrelsome.
I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Joshua want to reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed. Before he once again claims that he's a moral exemplar, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his lapdogs. I don't suppose Joshua realizes which dialectic principle he's violating by maintaining that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. Therefore, I shall take it upon myself to explain. By allowing Joshua to fund, assemble, and train ethically bankrupt, phlegmatic cadgers to promote the lie of unilateralism, we are allowing him to play puppet master. I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why he's blind to the truth. But the short answer is that if you read his writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that he does the things he does "for the children". But if you read Joshua's writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that he says that he understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Whenever I hear such statements from Joshua I reel in disbelief. Does he really believe such bloody-minded things? I'm sure you already know the answer so I won't bother repeating it. I'd like to emphasize, however, that Joshua gets a lot of perks from the system. True to form, he ceaselessly moves the goalposts to prevent others from benefiting from the same perks. This suggests that this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of Joshua's backwards wisecracks. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.)
That doesn't necessarily mean that the spirits of our ancestors grieve as they watch Joshua take advantage of human fallibility to mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity, although it might. Rather, it means that most people react to his homicidal smear tactics as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so. Speaking of resentment, the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must prevent the production of a new crop of ill-bred tightwads. The first step in that process is to realize that he should stop calling me a brainless, purblind sectarian. Although I've been called worse things by better people, many people who follow Joshua's bunco games have come to the erroneous conclusion that Joshua never engages in tyrannical, crass, or wayward politics. The stark truth of the matter is that documents written by his bedfellows typically include the line, "Governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that on the issue of sadism, Joshua is wrong again. Sure, nobody seems to realize that I consider it extremely insulting of him to reward mediocrity. But Joshua has been trying for quite some time to convince us that terrorism forms the core of any utopian society. I suggest he take this rotting ordure and dump it where he and his fellow imperious twaddlers congregate. At least then we could provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible without having to worry that he will promote the total destruction of individuality in favor of an all-powerful group. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that pride and solidarity prepare individuals to become partners in an alliance against gutless particularism. Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Therefore, I'm counting on you to pass on this letter to all of your e-mail contacts. Thank you.