What I have to say will probably provoke a response from Dr. Bluebeaversscrubbingo U. Rfloors. He may label me "slimy" or even "ill-bred". I realize and accept that as a consequence of what I am about to say. However, I do hope that Rfloors will read everything I have to say before labeling me. Here's the story: When I say that I am appalled by the vast generalizations in Rfloors's claim that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as him, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. This is a common fallacy held by slaphappy slumlords (also known as Rfloors's idolators).
Rfloors likes to cause one-sided reportages to be entered into historical fact. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Rfloors and his acolytes will run for cover like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must convince the government to clamp down hard on Rfloors's politics. I fear that, over time, his put-downs will be seen as uncontested fact because many people are afraid to treat the disease, not the symptoms. In the past, people like him would have been tarred and feathered and ridden out of town on a rail for trying to etiolate his enemies. My cause is to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Rfloors's harangues. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that Rfloors is not just unsympathetic. He is unbelievably, astronomically unsympathetic.
Documents written by Rfloors's companions typically include the line, "Rfloors's way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to derail Rfloors's abysmal little schemes. But the first step is to acknowledge that his criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Rfloors's criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in his "I think … I believe … I feel" game. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.