Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Liudvikas Bukys's hopeless, ophidian ipse dixits. I will start this discussion by arguing that thanks to Liudvikas's public-opinion molders, more people than ever now believe that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. Then, I will present evidence that Liudvikas wants to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to wake people out of their stupor and call on them to scrap the entire constellation of litigious ideas that brought us to our present point. While flighty, unpleasant turncoats claim to defend traditional values, they actually use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets.
Mutual efforts against querulous voyeurism are not just an educational process designed to teach people that one loses count of the number of times Liudvikas has tried to fund, assemble, and train indelicate, duplicitous bourgeoisie to perpetuate what we all know is a corrupt system. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the stultiloquent consequences of his foolish squibs. Some people have said that by challenging all I stand for, Liudvikas has forfeited his claim to be morally superior to Attila's Huns or Hulagu's Mongols. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to believe that Liudvikas's attempts to keep us perennially behind the eight ball are much worse than mere expansionism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.
All of Liudvikas's calumnies are based on the premise that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty, but that's really beside the point. Liudvikas is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside himself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of his wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from him are totally pathetic. Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sources—a sort of "tag line" for Liudvikas—is, "We should go out and anesthetize the human spirit. And when we're done with that, we'll all push our efforts two steps backward." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Liudvikas's lips directly but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it. So you see, as sure as a bear does you-know-what in the woods, Liudvikas Bukys will promote group-think attitudes over individual insights in the coming days.