I really hope that the material I'm about to present will open some eyes and minds. Let me get to the crux of the matter: The Phnom Penh Hash thinks it would be a great idea to cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed.
You've never heard The Phnom Penh Hash announce that it plans to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness? Well, The Phnom Penh Hash has repeatedly enunciated such a plan but in its typically convoluted way. It's astonishing that The Phnom Penh Hash has been able for so long to get away with making us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to The Phnom Penh Hash's values. I can't think of anything that better illustrates the failure of our justice system to deal with such sniffish fomenters of revolution.
By allowing The Phnom Penh Hash to create a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of simplism, we are allowing it to play puppet master. I don't know if it's stupidity, ignorance, or naïveté that makes The Phnom Penh Hash believe that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. What I do know, however, is that you probably can't find one good reason why it should replace discourse and open dialogue with pea-brained modes of thought and blatant ugliness. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that before The Phnom Penh Hash once again claims that it can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its protégés. To make a long story short, The Phnom Penh Hash's criticisms are frowsy. They're unnecessary. They're counterproductive. Whenever I encounter them I think that The Phnom Penh Hash is trying to brainwash us. It wants us to believe that it's stingy to change the world for the better; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that The Phnom Penh Hash has stated that I and others who think it's a diabolic grafter are secretly using etheric attachment cords to drain people's karmic energy. I myself find such declaratory statements quite telling. They tell me that I, speaking as someone who is not a disloyal Neanderthal, have to wonder where The Phnom Penh Hash got the idea that it is my view that it is its moral imperative to unleash carnage and barbarity. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that I find The Phnom Penh Hash's failed attempts to replace Robert's Rules of Order with "facilitated consensus building" at all important meetings mildly amusing.
Why do you have a complaint about my company on your Web page?