There is a dark force working to pander to the most insensitive gauleiters you'll ever see. That dark force is Instar. Let's get down to business: Instar drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes it sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that many people are convinced that Instar's grievances, while ideologically grounded in a rhetoric and practice of totalitarianism, are surrounded by a cloak of secrecy and "plausible denial". I can't comment on that, but I can say that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to put the kibosh on Instar's beliefs.
Careerism is the driving force behind Instar's hatchet jobs, period. The one thing that's central to all of Instar's abusive theatrics is a desire to spread unsavory, brutish views. I call this the New Metagrobolism. The old metagrobolism was concerned only with defiling the present and destroying the future. Although that was bad enough, the reason Instar wants to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis is that it's utterly contumacious. If you believe you have another explanation for its loopy, imprudent behavior, then please write and tell me about it.
I agree that Instar's unforgiving prevarications are to politics what the blitzkrieg was to international diplomacy. But I also think that Instar's goal is to undermine the current world order. This is abject favoritism!
As I've said before, the ultimate aim of Instar's prank phone calls is to restructure society as a pyramid with Instar at the top, Instar's backers directly underneath, the worst types of short-sighted, baleful busybodies there are beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Instar to burn our fair cities to the ground, which makes me realize that if it gets its way, none of us will be able to drive off and disperse the snippy dunderheads who pervert the course of justice. Therefore, we must not let it destroy our country from within. Instar maintains that "the truth", "the whole truth", and "nothing but the truth" are three different things. That's not just a lie but is actually the exact opposite of the truth—and Instar knows it. Why is Instar deliberately turning the truth on its head like that? To answer that question, note that history provides a number of instructive examples for us to study. For instance, it has long been the case that every time Instar tells its pals that those who disagree with it should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question.
One day, Instar might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that it is far more interested in fattening itself on the various processes of decay in our society than it is in helping us stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can say that it seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I don't say that to judge but merely to put its insolent false-flag operations into perspective. Instar should step down from its gilded pedestal. More than that, I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "Resentful bureaucrats like Instar tend to conveniently ignore the key issues of this or any other situation." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that many organizations lie. However, Instar lies with such ease it's troubling. Instar's sentiments are the opiate of the ghastly. There; my ranting is finished.
Why do you have a complaint about my company on your Web page?